Comments on: Enterprise Hypervisor comparison

By: air max shoes

air max shoes — Mon, 31 May 2010 02:44:00 +0000

Well , the view of the passage is totally correct ,your details is really reasonable and you guy give us valuable informative post, I totally agree the standpoint of upstairs. I often surfing on this forum when I m free and I find there are so much good information we can learn in this forum!

By: Wouter Heije

Wouter Heije — Mon, 28 Dec 2009 08:17:25 +0000

Hi,

great chart, one small addition. The XenServer hypervisor all have level one High Availability embedded from everrun. You only have to use the add-on for level 2 and level 3 fault tolerance.
Kind Regards

Wouter.
ps. Keep up the good work

By: Wouter Heije

Wouter Heije — Mon, 28 Dec 2009 08:17:00 +0000

Hi,

Wouter.
ps. Keep up the good work

By: ariel’s weblog » Comparación de Hypervisor gratuitos..

ariel’s weblog » Comparación de Hypervisor gratuitos.. — Sun, 26 Apr 2009 03:59:47 +0000

[...] http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2009/04/hypervisor-comparison/ [...]

By: Mattias

Mattias — Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:59:18 +0000

Wow, very impressive comparison! Great work! If you ever decide to expand your sheet, perhaps you could insert max-values. Especially for Hyper-V’s case, this could be interesting for the High Availability part (read: http://vinternals.com/2009/04/microsoft-myths-and-realities/)

By: Mattias

Mattias — Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:59:00 +0000

By: Impressive Hypervisor Comparison (ESX(i), Xen, Hyper-V) | Why so virtual?

Impressive Hypervisor Comparison (ESX(i), Xen, Hyper-V) | Why so virtual? — Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:57:33 +0000

[...] Their results can be found here: Enterprise Hypervisor comparison [...]