Comments on: Enterprise Hypervisor comparison (updated 04-06-09) http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2009/05/enterprise-hypervisor-comparison-update/ Creativity is inventing, experimenting, growing, taking risks, breaking rules, making mistakes, and having fun Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:01:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: air max shoes http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2009/05/enterprise-hypervisor-comparison-update/comment-page-1/#comment-2244 air max shoes Mon, 31 May 2010 03:04:00 +0000 http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/?p=1884#comment-2244 Well , the view of the passage is totally correct ,your details is really reasonable and you guy give us valuable informative post, I totally agree the standpoint of upstairs. I often surfing on this forum when I m free and I find there are so much good information we can learn in this forum! Well , the view of the passage is totally correct ,your details is really reasonable and you guy give us valuable informative post, I totally agree the standpoint of upstairs. I often surfing on this forum when I m free and I find there are so much good information we can learn in this forum!

]]> By: Jaracz http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2009/05/enterprise-hypervisor-comparison-update/comment-page-1/#comment-1471 Jaracz Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:00:13 +0000 http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/?p=1884#comment-1471 Hello again, Sorry, I made a mistake. I don't know why I thought, that when the vSphere4 Enterprise Plus Host can have more than 256 GB RAM, the VM can also adress more (with bigger FS block-size to create a swap-file bigger than 256 GB), but it seems, I was wrong (I couldn't test it). Sorry for that. Best Regards! Jaracz Hello again,

Sorry, I made a mistake. I don’t know why I thought, that when the vSphere4 Enterprise Plus Host can have more than 256 GB RAM, the VM can also adress more (with bigger FS block-size to create a swap-file bigger than 256 GB), but it seems, I was wrong (I couldn’t test it). Sorry for that.

Best Regards!

Jaracz

]]> By: Jaracz http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2009/05/enterprise-hypervisor-comparison-update/comment-page-1/#comment-2054 Jaracz Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:00:00 +0000 http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/?p=1884#comment-2054 Hello again, Sorry, I made a mistake. I don't know why I thought, that when the vSphere4 Enterprise Plus Host can have more than 256 GB RAM, the VM can also adress more (with bigger FS block-size to create a swap-file bigger than 256 GB), but it seems, I was wrong (I couldn't test it). Sorry for that. Best Regards! Jaracz Hello again,

Sorry, I made a mistake. I don’t know why I thought, that when the vSphere4 Enterprise Plus Host can have more than 256 GB RAM, the VM can also adress more (with bigger FS block-size to create a swap-file bigger than 256 GB), but it seems, I was wrong (I couldn’t test it). Sorry for that.

Best Regards!

Jaracz

]]> By: Jaracz http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2009/05/enterprise-hypervisor-comparison-update/comment-page-1/#comment-1470 Jaracz Wed, 09 Dec 2009 14:29:24 +0000 http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/?p=1884#comment-1470 Hi all! Some updates from me.. vSphere4 in Enterprise Plus Edition has no memory limit pro VM (implied, the filesystem supports files larger than 256 GB, i.e. block size > 1 MB). vSphere4 needs neither Intel-VT nor AMD-V. Xen needs one of those 2 extensions only to run Windows as Guest OS. Great comparision anyway! I'm also waiting for update of your chart with Xen Server 5.5 ;) Best Regards, Jaracz Hi all!

Some updates from me..

vSphere4 in Enterprise Plus Edition has no memory limit pro VM (implied, the filesystem supports files larger than 256 GB, i.e. block size > 1 MB).

vSphere4 needs neither Intel-VT nor AMD-V.
Xen needs one of those 2 extensions only to run Windows as Guest OS.

Great comparision anyway! I’m also waiting for update of your chart with Xen Server 5.5 ;)

Best Regards,

Jaracz

]]> By: Jaracz http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2009/05/enterprise-hypervisor-comparison-update/comment-page-1/#comment-2053 Jaracz Wed, 09 Dec 2009 14:29:00 +0000 http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/?p=1884#comment-2053 Hi all! Some updates from me.. vSphere4 in Enterprise Plus Edition has no memory limit pro VM (implied, the filesystem supports files larger than 256 GB, i.e. block size > 1 MB). vSphere4 needs neither Intel-VT nor AMD-V. Xen needs one of those 2 extensions only to run Windows as Guest OS. Great comparision anyway! I'm also waiting for update of your chart with Xen Server 5.5 ;) Best Regards, Jaracz Hi all!

Some updates from me..

vSphere4 in Enterprise Plus Edition has no memory limit pro VM (implied, the filesystem supports files larger than 256 GB, i.e. block size > 1 MB).

vSphere4 needs neither Intel-VT nor AMD-V.
Xen needs one of those 2 extensions only to run Windows as Guest OS.

Great comparision anyway! I’m also waiting for update of your chart with Xen Server 5.5 ;)

Best Regards,

Jaracz

]]> By: Erik Scholten http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2009/05/enterprise-hypervisor-comparison-update/comment-page-1/#comment-1425 Erik Scholten Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:39:02 +0000 http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/?p=1884#comment-1425 True. It certainly is time for an update but because we're very busy at the moment we haven't had the time to do this. I hope we can update the comparison soon and supply you with a new comparison. True. It certainly is time for an update but because we’re very busy at the moment we haven’t had the time to do this. I hope we can update the comparison soon and supply you with a new comparison.

]]> By: Erik Scholten http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2009/05/enterprise-hypervisor-comparison-update/comment-page-1/#comment-2052 Erik Scholten Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:39:00 +0000 http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/?p=1884#comment-2052 True. It certainly is time for an update but because we're very busy at the moment we haven't had the time to do this. I hope we can update the comparison soon and supply you with a new comparison. True. It certainly is time for an update but because we’re very busy at the moment we haven’t had the time to do this. I hope we can update the comparison soon and supply you with a new comparison.

]]> By: Roel http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2009/05/enterprise-hypervisor-comparison-update/comment-page-1/#comment-1424 Roel Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:31:05 +0000 http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/?p=1884#comment-1424 Great list but time for a update now that R2 is released? I don't have inside to the information but maybe someone knows I/O values for network and storage? and in the review R2 is released so it would make the caparison more up-to-date Great list but time for a update now that R2 is released?
I don’t have inside to the information but maybe someone knows I/O values for network and storage? and in the review R2 is released so it would make the caparison more up-to-date

]]> By: Roel http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2009/05/enterprise-hypervisor-comparison-update/comment-page-1/#comment-2051 Roel Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:31:00 +0000 http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/?p=1884#comment-2051 Great list but time for a update now that R2 is released? I don't have inside to the information but maybe someone knows I/O values for network and storage? and in the review R2 is released so it would make the caparison more up-to-date Great list but time for a update now that R2 is released?
I don’t have inside to the information but maybe someone knows I/O values for network and storage? and in the review R2 is released so it would make the caparison more up-to-date

]]> By: Tazz http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2009/05/enterprise-hypervisor-comparison-update/comment-page-1/#comment-493 Tazz Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:55:17 +0000 http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/?p=1884#comment-493 @Mark K. That's a great addition indeed. I will certainly take that into account in the next release. I will see if I can add SAN support for all major manufacturers (HP, EMC, NetApp, Dell EqualLogic) @Mark K. That’s a great addition indeed. I will certainly take that into account in the next release. I will see if I can add SAN support for all major manufacturers (HP, EMC, NetApp, Dell EqualLogic)

]]>