<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Virtual Infrastructure best practices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2009/11/virtual-infrastructure-best-practices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2009/11/virtual-infrastructure-best-practices/</link>
	<description>Creativity is inventing, experimenting, growing, taking risks, breaking rules, making mistakes, and having fun</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 11:12:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bookmarks for February 5th through February 10th &#124; Savage Nomads</title>
		<link>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2009/11/virtual-infrastructure-best-practices/comment-page-1/#comment-1675</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookmarks for February 5th through February 10th &#124; Savage Nomads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/?p=2717#comment-1675</guid>
		<description>[...] Virtual Infrastructure best practices &#124; VMGuru.nl &#8211; I choose (a virtual) life! &#8211; Lately I keep receiving questions from colleagues regarding virtual infrastructure design using VMware products. So I decided to sum up the best practices I use when designing a new virtual infrastructure. Some of the best practices are based on numbers and calculations but others are pretty obvious. Nevertheless you would be surprised how many environments I&#8217;ve encounter were the most basic best practices have NOT been met.  AKPC_IDS += &quot;1566,&quot;;             Posted in Daily Links, Misc &#124; Tags: activedirectory, esx, sharepoint2010, sn, sql, vmware   &#171; Bookmarks for February 3rd through February 4th   You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.        blog comments powered by Disqus  var disqus_url = &#039;http://www.savagenomads.net/2010/02/10/bookmarks_for_february_5th_through_february_10th/ &#039;; var disqus_container_id = &#039;disqus_thread&#039;; var facebookXdReceiverPath = &#039;http://www.savagenomads.net/wp-content/plugins/disqus-comment-system/xd_receiver.htm&#039;;   var DsqLocal = { &#039;trackbacks&#039;: [ ], &#039;trackback_url&#039;: &#039;http://www.savagenomads.net/2010/02/10/bookmarks_for_february_5th_through_february_10th/trackback/&#039; }; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Virtual Infrastructure best practices | VMGuru.nl &#8211; I choose (a virtual) life! &#8211; Lately I keep receiving questions from colleagues regarding virtual infrastructure design using VMware products. So I decided to sum up the best practices I use when designing a new virtual infrastructure. Some of the best practices are based on numbers and calculations but others are pretty obvious. Nevertheless you would be surprised how many environments I&rsquo;ve encounter were the most basic best practices have NOT been met.  AKPC_IDS += &quot;1566,&quot;;             Posted in Daily Links, Misc | Tags: activedirectory, esx, sharepoint2010, sn, sql, vmware   &laquo; Bookmarks for February 3rd through February 4th   You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.        blog comments powered by Disqus  var disqus_url = &#39;http://www.savagenomads.net/2010/02/10/bookmarks_for_february_5th_through_february_10th/ &#39;; var disqus_container_id = &#39;disqus_thread&#39;; var facebookXdReceiverPath = &#39;http://www.savagenomads.net/wp-content/plugins/disqus-comment-system/xd_receiver.htm&#39;;   var DsqLocal = { &#39;trackbacks&#39;: [ ], &#39;trackback_url&#39;: &#39;http://www.savagenomads.net/2010/02/10/bookmarks_for_february_5th_through_february_10th/trackback/&#39; }; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Musings on VDI performance &#187; TechAgility</title>
		<link>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2009/11/virtual-infrastructure-best-practices/comment-page-1/#comment-1561</link>
		<dc:creator>Musings on VDI performance &#187; TechAgility</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 06:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/?p=2717#comment-1561</guid>
		<description>[...] practices, VMware View sizing &amp; best practices which followed on from this original article Virtual Infrastructure best practices and in essence this confirms that the storage requirements will need to focused somewhere around an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] practices, VMware View sizing &amp; best practices which followed on from this original article Virtual Infrastructure best practices and in essence this confirms that the storage requirements will need to focused somewhere around an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Scholten</title>
		<link>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2009/11/virtual-infrastructure-best-practices/comment-page-1/#comment-1426</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Scholten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/?p=2717#comment-1426</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re welcome.

1) Idd, partitioning only applies to ESX.
2) In my opinion this is certainly a &#039;must&#039; although I have seen virtual infrastructures with misaligned disks which are not affected due to the low load on the environment. In stressed environments this will have more affect and you should align the partitions to get the best IO performance. 

Keep in mind that there are two locations/disk/volumes to align. 

First of all you should align the datastore/VMFS. Just use the vSphere client to create your datastore, this automatically does it for you. 

Second you should align the virtual machine partitions in the vmdk disk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re welcome.</p>
<p>1) Idd, partitioning only applies to ESX.<br />
2) In my opinion this is certainly a &#8216;must&#8217; although I have seen virtual infrastructures with misaligned disks which are not affected due to the low load on the environment. In stressed environments this will have more affect and you should align the partitions to get the best IO performance. </p>
<p>Keep in mind that there are two locations/disk/volumes to align. </p>
<p>First of all you should align the datastore/VMFS. Just use the vSphere client to create your datastore, this automatically does it for you. </p>
<p>Second you should align the virtual machine partitions in the vmdk disk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaap</title>
		<link>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2009/11/virtual-infrastructure-best-practices/comment-page-1/#comment-1423</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/?p=2717#comment-1423</guid>
		<description>Hi Erik,

Thanks for the article.
Two questions though:

1.) The part of &quot;partitioning&quot; only applies to the use of ESX and not ESXi?
2.) During my search on partitioning I stumbled on a (few) posts on aligning
    partitions, because it has an impact on performance.
    http://communities.vmware.com/message/1326824#1326824
    Is this a &#039;must do&#039; :) ?

Thanx Jaap</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Erik,</p>
<p>Thanks for the article.<br />
Two questions though:</p>
<p>1.) The part of &#8220;partitioning&#8221; only applies to the use of ESX and not ESXi?<br />
2.) During my search on partitioning I stumbled on a (few) posts on aligning<br />
    partitions, because it has an impact on performance.<br />
    <a href="http://communities.vmware.com/message/1326824#1326824" rel="nofollow">http://communities.vmware.com/message/1326824#1326824</a><br />
    Is this a &#8216;must do&#8217; <img src='http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  ?</p>
<p>Thanx Jaap</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Scholten</title>
		<link>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2009/11/virtual-infrastructure-best-practices/comment-page-1/#comment-1417</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Scholten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/?p=2717#comment-1417</guid>
		<description>These are best practices I collected during the last 6 to 7 years since I work with VMware ESX/VI. I can&#039;t remember where I found what best practice or from which colleague I heard it .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are best practices I collected during the last 6 to 7 years since I work with VMware ESX/VI. I can&#8217;t remember where I found what best practice or from which colleague I heard it .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2009/11/virtual-infrastructure-best-practices/comment-page-1/#comment-1380</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/?p=2717#comment-1380</guid>
		<description>My justification would normally be &quot;flexibility&quot;. If you pick a larger blocksize now you have more flexibility to grow later. If you pick a smaller one you are more or less restricted because of the block size and would need to svmotion vms around.

Some best practices seem to be copied from other articles, might nice to add a link to the source.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My justification would normally be &#8220;flexibility&#8221;. If you pick a larger blocksize now you have more flexibility to grow later. If you pick a smaller one you are more or less restricted because of the block size and would need to svmotion vms around.</p>
<p>Some best practices seem to be copied from other articles, might nice to add a link to the source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Scholten</title>
		<link>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2009/11/virtual-infrastructure-best-practices/comment-page-1/#comment-1357</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Scholten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 09:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/?p=2717#comment-1357</guid>
		<description>@Duncan:

1) You have a good head ;-) These were ESX3 numbers. Updated with vSphere now.
2) Added that. I prefer su because I&#039;m not such a linux/SC wizkid.
3) I only use it in very small environments (2-3 ESX hosts) where it&#039;s easy too keep it consistent. In larger environment there&#039;s a physical DNS (and AD) most of the time.
4)I&#039;m curious what you use as block size and on which arguments you base your decision. Block size is always a bit of a grey area. VMware states that block sizes do not have a  performance penalty and VMFS uses sub channels so small file sizes are no issue either.
5)This is idd no &#039;regular&#039; diagram. I used it to indicate that such setups are complex but it&#039;s easy to see which connection is used for which function. In this case I did not use all nics but the customer wanted to use all to improve on redundancy and capacity. Because of that I added the spare nics to the management and VM network.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Duncan:</p>
<p>1) You have a good head <img src='http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  These were ESX3 numbers. Updated with vSphere now.<br />
2) Added that. I prefer su because I&#8217;m not such a linux/SC wizkid.<br />
3) I only use it in very small environments (2-3 ESX hosts) where it&#8217;s easy too keep it consistent. In larger environment there&#8217;s a physical DNS (and AD) most of the time.<br />
4)I&#8217;m curious what you use as block size and on which arguments you base your decision. Block size is always a bit of a grey area. VMware states that block sizes do not have a  performance penalty and VMFS uses sub channels so small file sizes are no issue either.<br />
5)This is idd no &#8216;regular&#8217; diagram. I used it to indicate that such setups are complex but it&#8217;s easy to see which connection is used for which function. In this case I did not use all nics but the customer wanted to use all to improve on redundancy and capacity. Because of that I added the spare nics to the management and VM network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2009/11/virtual-infrastructure-best-practices/comment-page-1/#comment-1355</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 23:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/?p=2717#comment-1355</guid>
		<description>1) the /boot and the vmkcore are a different size by default than you mention. It&#039;s 1100 and 150Mb from the top of my head.

2) I would recommend to use SUDO instead of SU, as SUDO leaves the perfect audit trail

3) I never recommend a host file as it leads to inconsistency

4) Lun Size and Blocksizes, I wouldn&#039;t recommend default based on those arguments.

5) The Networking Diagram doesn&#039;t seem like a &quot;regular&quot; diagram with 3 nics for the management layer... why is that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) the /boot and the vmkcore are a different size by default than you mention. It&#8217;s 1100 and 150Mb from the top of my head.</p>
<p>2) I would recommend to use SUDO instead of SU, as SUDO leaves the perfect audit trail</p>
<p>3) I never recommend a host file as it leads to inconsistency</p>
<p>4) Lun Size and Blocksizes, I wouldn&#8217;t recommend default based on those arguments.</p>
<p>5) The Networking Diagram doesn&#8217;t seem like a &#8220;regular&#8221; diagram with 3 nics for the management layer&#8230; why is that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ande Leibovici</title>
		<link>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2009/11/virtual-infrastructure-best-practices/comment-page-1/#comment-1353</link>
		<dc:creator>Ande Leibovici</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/?p=2717#comment-1353</guid>
		<description>Erik, great initiative and amazing effort from the community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erik, great initiative and amazing effort from the community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Scholten</title>
		<link>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2009/11/virtual-infrastructure-best-practices/comment-page-1/#comment-1352</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Scholten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 20:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/?p=2717#comment-1352</guid>
		<description>@Forbes Guthrie: Oh damn, how could we have missed that during the review? You&#039;re totally correct. I&#039;ve changed it.

@J.R. Kalf: Thanks, I added a disk alignment section.

@Marius Redelinghuys: Thanks again. I added a hardware assistance and storage to the ESX(i) section.

With your additions this Best Pratices article is getting better by the day. Great community effort!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Forbes Guthrie: Oh damn, how could we have missed that during the review? You&#8217;re totally correct. I&#8217;ve changed it.</p>
<p>@<a href="http://twitter.com/J" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" title="View J's Twitter Profile">J</a>.R. Kalf: Thanks, I added a disk alignment section.</p>
<p>@<a href="http://twitter.com/Marius" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" title="View Marius's Twitter Profile">Marius</a> Redelinghuys: Thanks again. I added a hardware assistance and storage to the ESX(i) section.</p>
<p>With your additions this Best Pratices article is getting better by the day. Great community effort!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
