<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WAN optimization for VMware View 4.0 PCoIP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2009/12/wan-optimization-for-vmware-view-4-0-pcoip/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2009/12/wan-optimization-for-vmware-view-4-0-pcoip/</link>
	<description>Creativity is inventing, experimenting, growing, taking risks, breaking rules, making mistakes, and having fun</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:01:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaune</title>
		<link>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2009/12/wan-optimization-for-vmware-view-4-0-pcoip/comment-page-1/#comment-2414</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaune</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 12:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/?p=2913#comment-2414</guid>
		<description>Because your thin client dosen&#039;t suppor Pcoip</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because your thin client dosen&#8217;t suppor Pcoip</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AG4IT</title>
		<link>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2009/12/wan-optimization-for-vmware-view-4-0-pcoip/comment-page-1/#comment-1795</link>
		<dc:creator>AG4IT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 14:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/?p=2913#comment-1795</guid>
		<description>PCoIP is certainly a great display protocol.  However in some scenarios of slow remote connections (like over certain WANs) there may be issues where PCoIP doesn&#039;t function quite as well.  In those cases, you can complement the VMware View deployment with Ericom Blaze, a software-based RDP acceleration and compression product that provides improved performance over WANs. Besides delivering higher frame rates and reducing screen freezes and choppiness, Blaze accelerates RDP performance by up to 10-25 times, while significantly reducing network bandwidth consumption over low-bandwidth/high latency connections.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You can use VMware View with PCoIP for your LAN and fast WAN users, and at the same time use VMware View with Blaze over RDP for your slow WAN users.  This combined solution can provide enhanced performance in both types of environments, letting you get the best out of VMware View for your users.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Read more about Blaze and download a free evaluation at:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ericom.com/ericom_blaze.asp?URL_ID=708&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.ericom.com/ericom_blaze.asp?URL_ID=708&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Adam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PCoIP is certainly a great display protocol.  However in some scenarios of slow remote connections (like over certain WANs) there may be issues where PCoIP doesn&#39;t function quite as well.  In those cases, you can complement the VMware View deployment with Ericom Blaze, a software-based RDP acceleration and compression product that provides improved performance over WANs. Besides delivering higher frame rates and reducing screen freezes and choppiness, Blaze accelerates RDP performance by up to 10-25 times, while significantly reducing network bandwidth consumption over low-bandwidth/high latency connections.</p>
<p>You can use VMware View with PCoIP for your LAN and fast WAN users, and at the same time use VMware View with Blaze over RDP for your slow WAN users.  This combined solution can provide enhanced performance in both types of environments, letting you get the best out of VMware View for your users.</p>
<p>Read more about Blaze and download a free evaluation at:<br /><a href="http://www.ericom.com/ericom_blaze.asp?URL_ID=708" rel="nofollow">http://www.ericom.com/ericom_blaze.asp?URL_ID=708</a></p>
<p>Adam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricky310</title>
		<link>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2009/12/wan-optimization-for-vmware-view-4-0-pcoip/comment-page-1/#comment-1682</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricky310</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 04:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/?p=2913#comment-1682</guid>
		<description>Video perfomance using PCoIP over the WAN is alot worse than RDP for me wich I dont understand.&lt;br&gt;Latency is 25ms w/ 6mb download at the remote location where my HP T5545 is at. Main Office where the Windows XP VM and VMware View server location is&gt; speeds&gt; 30MB down+ 9MB up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Video perfomance using PCoIP over the WAN is alot worse than RDP for me wich I dont understand.<br />Latency is 25ms w/ 6mb download at the remote location where my HP T5545 is at. Main Office where the Windows XP VM and VMware View server location is&gt; speeds&gt; 30MB down+ 9MB up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

