<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to: License Microsoft Windows Server in a VMware environment – Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2010/04/how-to-license-microsoft-windows-server-in-a-vmware-environment-%e2%80%93-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2010/04/how-to-license-microsoft-windows-server-in-a-vmware-environment-%e2%80%93-part-1/</link>
	<description>Creativity is inventing, experimenting, growing, taking risks, breaking rules, making mistakes, and having fun</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:01:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unlimited virtualization rights price breakeven point for Windows Server &#124; Servers and Storage &#124; TechRepublic.com</title>
		<link>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2010/04/how-to-license-microsoft-windows-server-in-a-vmware-environment-%e2%80%93-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1876</link>
		<dc:creator>Unlimited virtualization rights price breakeven point for Windows Server &#124; Servers and Storage &#124; TechRepublic.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 20:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/?p=3563#comment-1876</guid>
		<description>[...] start the cost savings, but unless you are consolidating at 10:1 or higher, datacenter costs more. For one virtualization integrator, Erik Scholten, his price model put it at 7:1 to make sense. You should also consider that unlimited virtualization rights is not just for Windows Server 2008 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] start the cost savings, but unless you are consolidating at 10:1 or higher, datacenter costs more. For one virtualization integrator, Erik Scholten, his price model put it at 7:1 to make sense. You should also consider that unlimited virtualization rights is not just for Windows Server 2008 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric K. Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2010/04/how-to-license-microsoft-windows-server-in-a-vmware-environment-%e2%80%93-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1775</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric K. Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 03:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/?p=3563#comment-1775</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, for service providers trying to use their SPLA licenses, there are enough restrictions to make someone go bonkers.  For instance, Microsoft says that SPLA licenses can&#039;t be used in conjunction with volume licenses, retail licenses, etc.  So, customers who are transitioning from an on-premise environment to a hosted environment (the majority of companies are doing this slowly) must use &quot;only&quot; SPLA licenses &quot;or&quot; volume licenses or retail licenses at the hosted site.  To gain the benefit of the hosted environment, most companies would prefer to use SPLA licensing for &quot;new&quot; software, but would still like to use some of their existing expensive volume or retail licenses during a slow transition to a hosted environment.  Why should these volume or retail licenses be thrown away?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, as much as Microsoft has assisted in providing numerous licensing options for virtual environments (much appreciated), they have continued to create barriers like this for a large part of the market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, for service providers trying to use their SPLA licenses, there are enough restrictions to make someone go bonkers.  For instance, Microsoft says that SPLA licenses can&#39;t be used in conjunction with volume licenses, retail licenses, etc.  So, customers who are transitioning from an on-premise environment to a hosted environment (the majority of companies are doing this slowly) must use &#8220;only&#8221; SPLA licenses &#8220;or&#8221; volume licenses or retail licenses at the hosted site.  To gain the benefit of the hosted environment, most companies would prefer to use SPLA licensing for &#8220;new&#8221; software, but would still like to use some of their existing expensive volume or retail licenses during a slow transition to a hosted environment.  Why should these volume or retail licenses be thrown away?</p>
<p>So, as much as Microsoft has assisted in providing numerous licensing options for virtual environments (much appreciated), they have continued to create barriers like this for a large part of the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edwin</title>
		<link>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2010/04/how-to-license-microsoft-windows-server-in-a-vmware-environment-%e2%80%93-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1723</link>
		<dc:creator>Edwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/?p=3563#comment-1723</guid>
		<description>I found the retail prices for Windows 2008 editions without CALs combined to it:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Prices are for US but good to compare and see where the break even point is situated.&lt;br&gt;Standard edition: $726,-&lt;br&gt;Enterprise edition: $2.358,-&lt;br&gt;Datacenter edition: $ 2.405,-&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Using these numbers the break even point will be @ 8 virtual machines and above on a 2 cpu socket machine. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Source: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.microsoft.com/Windowsserver2008/en/us/hyperv-calculators.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/Windowsserver2008/en/u...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found the retail prices for Windows 2008 editions without CALs combined to it:</p>
<p>Prices are for US but good to compare and see where the break even point is situated.<br />Standard edition: $726,-<br />Enterprise edition: $2.358,-<br />Datacenter edition: $ 2.405,-</p>
<p>Using these numbers the break even point will be @ 8 virtual machines and above on a 2 cpu socket machine. </p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/Windowsserver2008/en/us/hyperv-calculators.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/Windowsserver2008/en/u&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

