<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>VMGuru.nl - I choose (a virtual) life! &#187; Microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/category/microsoft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress</link>
	<description>Creativity is inventing, experimenting, growing, taking risks, breaking rules, making mistakes, and having fun</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:10:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Hyper-V removed from OpenStack</title>
		<link>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2012/02/hyper-v-removed-from-openstack/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2012/02/hyper-v-removed-from-openstack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 11:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Scholten</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenStack]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/?p=7909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The new version of OpenStack, which will be released in Q2 of 2012, does not support Microsoft Hyper-V anymore. The developers have had enough with the buggy code. One of the developers of OpenStack has written a patch with which the Hyper-V code and support will be removed from the cloud platform. The patch has [...]</p>
<div style="display:block"><small><em>by Erik Scholten </em></small></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2012/02/hyper-v-removed-from-openstack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Veeam Backup &amp; Replication v6 released</title>
		<link>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2011/12/veeam-backup-replication-v6-released/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2011/12/veeam-backup-replication-v6-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 06:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sander Martijn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hyper-V]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Third party product(s)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veaam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/?p=7493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This week Veeam released their latest version of their Backup &amp; Replication software &#8220;Veeam Backup &amp; Replication v6&#8220;. With their latest release they offer enhanced scalability and performance. They also add support for Microsoft Hyper-V so you can protect your multi-hypervisor environment with only one product, from a single console. New features in version 6 [...]</p>
<div style="display:block"><small><em>by Sander Martijn </em></small></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2011/12/veeam-backup-replication-v6-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Updated Enterprise hypervisor comparison</title>
		<link>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2011/11/updated-enterprise-hypervisor-comparison/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2011/11/updated-enterprise-hypervisor-comparison/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 21:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Scholten</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyper-V]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vSphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenDesktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenServer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/?p=7480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>During the last few years we published several Enterprise Hypervisor comparisons and we got very positive comments and feedback on it. With the release of vSphere 5, XenServer 6 and a service pack for Hyper-V it was time for an update. It very interesting to see how some of the products have improved over the [...]</p>
<div style="display:block"><small><em>by Erik Scholten </em></small></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2011/11/updated-enterprise-hypervisor-comparison/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to license Microsoft Windows 7 for VMware View deployments</title>
		<link>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2011/07/how-to-license-microsoft-windows-7-for-vmware-view-deployments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2011/07/how-to-license-microsoft-windows-7-for-vmware-view-deployments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 10:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edwin Weijdema</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How To]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[View]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RUR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/?p=6679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I often get questions about how to license Microsoft Windows 7 in a VMware View VDI deployment, I will try to elaborate what is needed in general and for specific scenarios. By understanding how they apply to common VMware View scenarios you can calculate and try to get the most out of existing and new [...]</p>
<div style="display:block"><small><em>by Edwin Weijdema </em></small></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2011/07/how-to-license-microsoft-windows-7-for-vmware-view-deployments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Updated VMware support policy on MSCS</title>
		<link>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2011/05/exchange-ccr-cluster-on-vmware-with-iscsi-updated/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2011/05/exchange-ccr-cluster-on-vmware-with-iscsi-updated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 05:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Scholten</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knowledgebase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange CCR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vStorage VMFS/Storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/?p=6198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>August 2010 I wrote an article on support for Exchange CCR clustering on VMware with iSCSI. VMware&#8217;s response then was very simple and straight forward. Exchange CCR clustering on VMware is not supported on iSCSI! When asked if VMware had plans to change this support issue in the future the response was promising. &#8220;The Exchange [...]</p>
<div style="display:block"><small><em>by Erik Scholten </em></small></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2011/05/exchange-ccr-cluster-on-vmware-with-iscsi-updated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VMware is still the best!</title>
		<link>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2011/04/vmware-is-still-the-best/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2011/04/vmware-is-still-the-best/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Muetstege</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyper-V]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vSphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenServer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/?p=5998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Of course we all knew that already Paul Venezia posted an in depth article on Infoworld where he compares the four main server virtualization software competitors on a selection of criteria. Now, you can nit-pick on the measurements he made or the criteria he has chosen, but in general I think it&#8217;s a solid test [...]</p>
<div style="display:block"><small><em>by Alex Muetstege </em></small></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2011/04/vmware-is-still-the-best/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Exchange Server 2010 training by TrainSignal</title>
		<link>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2011/03/review-exchange-server-2010-training-by-trainsignal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2011/03/review-exchange-server-2010-training-by-trainsignal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 11:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Muetstege</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange 2010]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/?p=5807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Some time ago.. actually, a long time ago, we here at VMGuru.nl received a sample of a training DVD from TrainSignal. I promised to write a review on it, but I honestly didn&#8217;t come around to it due to all sorts of personal stuff. But the DVD box made it safely through the move from [...]</p>
<div style="display:block"><small><em>by Alex Muetstege </em></small></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2011/03/review-exchange-server-2010-training-by-trainsignal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows 7 unable to connect to View Connection Server</title>
		<link>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2011/02/windows-7-unable-to-connect-to-view-connection-server/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2011/02/windows-7-unable-to-connect-to-view-connection-server/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 06:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Scholten</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[View]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/?p=5703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>After installing the patches described in Microsoft Knowledge Base articles 2482017 or 2467023 Windows 7 clients are unable to connect from the View Client to the View Connection Server. According to a VMware Knowledge Base article there is a conflict with two security bulletins issued for Windows 7, causing disruptions for VMware&#8217;s View Client and [...]</p>
<div style="display:block"><small><em>by Erik Scholten </em></small></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2011/02/windows-7-unable-to-connect-to-view-connection-server/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comparing RemoteFX to RDP, ICA/HDX, EOP and PCoIP</title>
		<link>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2010/12/comparing-remotefx-to-rdp-icahdx-eop-and-pcoip/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2010/12/comparing-remotefx-to-rdp-icahdx-eop-and-pcoip/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 11:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anne Jan Elsinga</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCoIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[View]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/?p=5462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>One of my coworkers pointed me to a video from this years Tech-Ed Europe about VDI protocols. Bernhard Tritsch did an interesting comparison between the different remote protocols used in today&#8217;s VDI solutions. In a 60 minute session Bernhard explains the differences between location (host vs client), type (hardware vs software) rendering and compression types (lossless vs [...]</p>
<div style="display:block"><small><em>by Anne Jan Elsinga </em></small></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2010/12/comparing-remotefx-to-rdp-icahdx-eop-and-pcoip/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/te/Europe/2010/wmv/vir401.wmv" length="188168615" type="video/x-ms-wmv" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VMworld 2010 &#8211; The New Zimbra</title>
		<link>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2010/10/the-new-zimbra/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2010/10/the-new-zimbra/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 08:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Muetstege</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMworld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vSphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zimbra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMworld Europe 2010]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/?p=4721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve written about Zimbra before. Actually, we here at vmguru.nl use Zimbra for all our email and collaboration. So, today we were invited to join the Zimbra Breakfast Meeting at the Scandic Hotel in Copenhagen. Zimbra, for the ones who don&#8217;t know what it does, is a collaboration suite. It&#8217;s the open source exchange alternative. [...]</p>
<div style="display:block"><small><em>by Alex Muetstege </em></small></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vmguru.nl/wordpress/2010/10/the-new-zimbra/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

